Claude Opus 4.6: Why It Reclaimed the Throne of Agentic Coding

Claude Opus 4.6 is the latest AI model released by Anthropic on February 5, 2026—a pivotal moment in AI development history. In late 2025, Google’s Gemini 3 Pro swept the market with overwhelming inference speed, leading some to whisper that “the Claude era is over.” But Claude Opus 4.6 shattered that narrative by returning with a qualitative evolution.

So what’s the real essence of this update? It’s not just benchmark score improvements. In autonomous thinking and long-term task completion (Agentic Capability), Claude Opus 4.6 overwhelms its competitors. This article deep-dives into the latest Terminal-Bench 2.0 and SWE-bench Verified results while explaining why, from a working engineer’s perspective—especially for legacy code migration and complex debugging—you should choose Claude again.

1. Three New Features in Claude Opus 4.6

Before diving into benchmarks, let’s cover the new features. These three additions dramatically transform the development experience.

Enhanced Computer Use: GUI Operations at Human Level

The “Computer Use” feature, previously released in beta, has been massively upgraded. The old model had noticeable lag in a “capture → think → act” cycle, but the new model delivers dramatically faster processing. Continuous operations like drag-and-drop and scrolling element search now work smoothly. This enables Figma-to-VS Code collaboration workflows that previously required human hands.

Native MCP Integration: Direct Connection to Local Resources

Opus 4.6 integrates the Model Context Protocol (MCP) at a native level. This means connecting to PostgreSQL or Git without building a server—with secure communication guaranteed. You can operate through CLI or editor extensions, read DB schemas, and issue queries. “Writing code while looking at the database” now happens entirely within the chat window.

Adaptive Thinking: Autonomous Thought Depth Adjustment

This is the most engineer-relevant feature. Based on task difficulty, the model automatically adjusts its internal “thinking depth” (Effort Level). For complex tasks, it switches to High/Max mode, verifying multiple approaches before responding. This costs more inference tokens, but the probability of getting working code on the first try increases dramatically.

2. Claude Opus 4.6 Dominates Terminal-Bench 2.0: The “Perseverance” of 65.4%

The most shocking result for engineers was Terminal-Bench 2.0, which measures agentic coding ability. This benchmark is fundamentally different from traditional tests: it uses a virtual terminal environment where the AI must autonomously install libraries, set up environments, run tests, and analyze/fix error logs.

• Claude Opus 4.6: 65.4%
• Gemini 3 Pro: 58.2%
• GPT-5.2 (Turbo): 55.9%

This 7-point gap carries significance beyond the numbers. Gemini 3 Pro is fast—nearly 1.5x speed in initial code generation. But when confronting complex dependency errors, Gemini tends to hallucinate and fall into loop states where it repeats the same fix command.

Opus 4.6, by contrast, behaves like a seasoned senior engineer. When an error occurs, instead of immediately retrying, it pauses to read the entire log with cat, infers the root cause, and plans: “If approach A fails, try B.” It grinds through debugging methodically. This “never-give-up perseverance” is the decisive differentiator in agentic workflows.

3. One Million Tokens: The Memory Demonstrated in MRCR v2

Claude Opus 4.6 expanded its context window to 1 million tokens. But what matters isn’t just size—it’s how accurately the model handles that massive context. Traditional models suffer from “information loss” as context grows, particularly in RAG-dependent systems where important mid-context instructions get ignored.

However, Opus 4.6 scored an astonishing 76% on the MRCR v2 (Multi-Hop Retrieval & Reasoning) benchmark. Gemini 3 Pro managed only 26.3%—an almost unbelievable performance gap.

Real-World Impact: Large-Scale Legacy Migration

How does this translate to practice? My jQuery-to-React 20 migration project last week is the perfect example. I fed Opus 4.6 over 50,000 lines of spaghetti JavaScript and asked for refactoring.

Opus 4.6 flagged a dependency I had completely overlooked: “This global variable userState depends on initialization logic in auth.js, 50 files away, and may be overwritten asynchronously—be careful when migrating to React’s useContext.”

Gemini 3 Pro handles syntax conversion quickly, but it cannot detect logical contradictions across distant files. Claude Opus 4.6 understands the entire codebase as a single system and accurately predicts how local changes impact the whole.

4. “Tree of Thoughts” Reasoning in Claude Opus 4.6

Another distinguishing feature of Opus 4.6 is its evolved reasoning process. Traditional “Chain of Thought” reasoning followed a single linear path, but Opus 4.6 appears to perform internal exploration closer to a “Tree of Thoughts” approach.

When using Cursor in VS Code, you can observe Claude Opus 4.6 comparing multiple solutions: “Approach A (regex replacement) is fast but weak on edge cases. Approach B (AST parsing) is robust but costly to implement. Since this is a high-stakes payment module, I’ll adopt B and implement it in the following steps.”

This way, the model articulates design rationale—why it writes certain code—and presents options to the programmer. This is no longer “autocomplete.” It’s closer to a conversation with a technical advisor.

5. The Adoption Barrier: Balancing Cost and Speed

Of course, Claude Opus 4.6 isn’t a silver bullet. The biggest bottleneck is speed and cost. Compared to Gemini 3 Pro Flash, generation speed is about 60%, and API costs remain high.

Therefore, using Claude Opus 4.6 for every task isn’t wise. The smart approach is model routing:

• Gemini 3 Pro: Prototyping, simple unit test generation, documentation (speed-first)
• Claude Opus 4.6: Architecture design, complex bug identification, security audits, large-scale refactoring (quality-first)

This “right model for the right job” approach is becoming an essential skill for engineers in 2026.

6. Conclusion: Coding Enters the Era of “Completion Power”

What do we really need from AI coding in 2026? A “fast typist”? Or a “partner you can trust with the job”?

If you’re writing simple scripts, Gemini 3 Pro or GPT-5.2 will do just fine—they might even feel more comfortable. But if you’re wrestling with tens of thousands of lines of legacy code, struggling with bugs no one can trace, then call Claude Opus 4.6 without hesitation.

Because Claude Opus 4.6 never gives up. It swims through oceans of logs and finds the thread that leads to a solution. The king has returned—and we can finally go home in peace.

ブラウザだけでできる本格的なAI画像生成【ConoHa AI Canvas】

swiftwand

X

AIを使って、毎日の生活をもっと快適にするアイデアや将来像を発信しています。 初心者にもわかりやすく、すぐに取り入れられる実践的な情報をお届けします。 Sharing ideas and visions for a better daily life with AI. Practical tips that anyone can start using right away.